NEBRASKA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION

August 24, 2005

Staybridge Suites                         Staybridge Room                         Lincoln, NE


Opening

Acting Chairperson Moline convened a meeting of the Nebraska Real Estate Commission at 9:04 a.m. on August 24, 2005, in the Staybridge Room of the Staybridge Suites, located at 2701 Fletcher Avenue in Lincoln, Nebraska. All of the members of the Real Estate Commission were present, with the exception of Chairperson Gale. Also present were Director Les Tyrrell, Deputy Director for Education Teresa Hoffman, Deputy Director for Enforcement Terry Mayrose, and Administrative Assistant Heidi Burklund. Neal Stenberg, Special Assistant Attorney General and Counsel to the Commission, was present for the discussion on hiring pre-hearing conference officers.

Notice of Meeting (Adopt Agenda)

Director Tyrrell presented a public notice and proofs of publication thereof relating to this meeting, all of which are attached to and made a part of these minutes. Acting Chairperson Moline reported that all Commissioners had been notified of the meeting simultaneously, in writing, and that a proposed tentative agenda accompanied the notification.

Acting Chairperson Moline pointed out to those in attendance that a public copy of the materials being used during the meeting was available to the public on the counsel table in the meeting room, and that the procedures followed were in accordance with the Open Meetings Law. Acting Chairperson Moline asked that guests sign the guest list.

Director Tyrrell noted that no agenda items had been added since the tentative agenda was mailed to the Commissioners.

After review of the final agenda, a motion was made by Poskochil and seconded by Strand to adopt the final agenda as presented. Motion carried with Grady, Johnson, Poskochil, Shepard, Strand, and Moline voting aye, and with Gale not participating or voting, being absent and excused.

Minutes of June 13, 2005

The minutes of the Commission meeting held on June 13, 2005, were considered.

After review, a motion was made by Grady and seconded by Shepard to approve the minutes as presented. Motion carried with Grady, Johnson, Poskochil, Shepard, and Moline voting aye, with Gale not participating or voting, being absent and excused, and with Strand not participating or voting, not having been present for the meeting.

Receipts and Expenditures Reports

Director Tyrrell presented the Receipts and Expenditures Reports for June and July. Copies of said reports are attached to and made a part of these minutes.

The cash fund balance as of June 30, 2005, was $878,697.82, which compared to a cash fund balance of $797,334.13 on June 30, 2004.

The cash fund balance as of July 31, 2005, was $847,721.29, which compared to a cash fund balance of $757,958.03 on July 31, 2004.

After discussion, a motion was made by Shepard and seconded by Grady to file the June and July Receipts and Expenditures Reports for audit. Motion carried with Grady, Johnson, Poskochil, Shepard, Strand, and Moline voting aye, and with Gale not participating or voting, being absent and excused.

Final Renewal Report

Director Tyrrell presented the final Renewal Report, which showed renewals as of June 30, 2005. A copy of said report is attached to and made a part of these minutes.

No action was necessary on this report.

Budget Spread for Fiscal Year 05-06

Director Tyrrell presented the Budget Spread for Fiscal Year 05-06. A copy of said report is attached to and made a part of these minutes.

Director Tyrrell noted that there would be an adjustment in the computer expenditure sections. Director Tyrrell decided to contract with the Communications Division to provide server and database support, rather than replace the servers currently maintained in the Commission office. Communications will house the servers, do all backups, and address all security issues for approximately $900 per year. The file server was done on Monday, and the database will be done in September.

No action was necessary on this report.

Specialized Registrations

Time-Share Registration

Private Quarters at Porto Cima, A Condominium, and
Retirement Community Registration
The Grand Lodge at the Preserve - Phase II
Consolidation under The Grand Lodge at the Preserve

Director Tyrrell presented a Time-Share Registration for Private Quarters at Porto Cima, A Condominium, and a Retirement Community Registration for The Grand Lodge at the Preserve - Phase II, and consolidation under The Grand Lodge at the Preserve. A copy of said report is attached to and made a part of these minutes.

After discussion, a motion was made by Johnson and seconded by Poskochil to approve the registrations as presented. Motion carried with Grady, Johnson, Poskochil, Shepard, Strand, and Moline voting aye, and with Gale not participating or voting, being absent and excused.

Non-Resident Licenses and Resident Licenses Issued to Persons Holding Licenses in Other Jurisdictions Report

Deputy Director Hoffman presented for ratification the Non-Resident Licenses and Resident Licenses Issued to Persons Holding Licenses in Other Jurisdictions Report, a copy of which is attached to and made a part of these minutes.

After review, a motion was made by Johnson and seconded by Strand to ratify issuance of the licenses as set forth in the report. Motion carried with Grady, Johnson, Poskochil, Shepard, Strand, and Moline voting aye, and with Gale not participating or voting, being absent and excused.

Examination Reports - June and July

Deputy Director Hoffman presented for ratification the June and July Examination Reports, copies of which are attached to and made a part of these minutes.

After review, a motion was made by Grady and seconded by Shepard to ratify the June and July Examination Reports for the purpose of issuing licenses. Motion carried with Grady, Johnson, Poskochil, Shepard, Strand, and Moline voting aye, and with Gale not participating or voting, being absent and excused.

Real Estate Education Matters

Pre-License Education Instructor Approval

Deputy Director Hoffman presented for ratification the Pre-License Education Instructor Approval Report, a copy of which is attached to and made a part of these minutes.

Continuing Education Activity Approval

Deputy Director Hoffman presented for ratification the Continuing Education Activity Approval Report, a copy of which is attached to and made a part of these minutes.

Continuing Education Instructor Approval

Deputy Director Hoffman presented for ratification the Pre-License Education Instructor Approval Report, a copy of which is attached to and made a part of these minutes.

Continuing Education Activity Significant Change

Deputy Director Hoffman presented an exhibit regarding a continuing education activity significant change, a copy of which is attached to and made a part of these minutes.

After review and discussion, a motion was made by Shepard and seconded by Johnson to ratify the reports. Motion carried with Grady, Johnson, Poskochil, Shepard, Strand, and Moline voting aye, and with Gale not participating or voting, being absent and excused.

Continuing Education Activity Rejection

Deputy Director Hoffman presented an exhibit regarding a continuing education activity rejection, a copy of which is attached to and made a part of these minutes.

No action was necessary on this report.

Pending Sworn Complaints and Investigative Matters

Director Tyrrell presented a summary report of the pending complaints, which included a list of licensees presently under disciplinary action or on appeal. A copy of said report is attached to and made a part of these minutes. Director Tyrrell noted that the report would be corrected so that the AOn Appeal@ heading was on the following page.

No action was necessary on this report.

The following sworn complaints and investigative matters were presented to the Commission:

Item A Complaint # 2005-007 - Elisabeth Jensen vs. Linda J. Medic

Deputy Director Mayrose presented the alleged violations and investigative report to the Commission and, when necessary, answered questions on this matter.

After being advised of the results of the investigation and discussion, a motion was made by Poskochil and seconded by Grady that the complaint be dismissed without prejudice. Motion carried with Grady, Johnson, Poskochil, Shepard, Strand, and Moline voting aye, and with Gale not participating or voting, being absent and excused.

Item B Complaint # 2005-012 - Grete H. Scholz vs. Gerald Owen Waldrop

Deputy Director Mayrose presented the alleged violations and investigative report to the Commission and, when necessary, answered questions on this matter.

After being advised of the results of the investigation and discussion, a motion was made by Grady and seconded by Johnson that the complaint be dismissed without prejudice. Motion carried with Grady, Johnson, Poskochil, Shepard, Strand, and Moline voting aye, and with Gale not participating or voting, being absent and excused.

Item C Complaint # 2005-014

Deputy Director Mayrose presented the alleged violations and investigative report to the Commission and, when necessary, answered questions on this matter.

After being advised of the results of the investigation and discussion, a motion was made by Grady and seconded by Poskochil that the complaint against Respondent B be set for hearing . Motion carried with Grady, Johnson, Poskochil, Shepard, Strand, and Moline voting aye, and with Gale not participating or voting, being absent and excused. A motion was made by Poskochil and seconded by Shepard that the complaint against Respondent A be dismissed without prejudice. Motion carried with Grady, Johnson, Poskochil, Shepard, Strand, and Moline voting aye, and with Gale not participating or voting, being absent and excused.

Item D Complaint # 2005-016 - Thomas E. Grafton vs. William Glenn Krein

Deputy Director Mayrose presented the alleged violations and investigative report to the Commission and, when necessary, answered questions on this matter.

After being advised of the results of the investigation and discussion, a motion was made by Grady and seconded by Strand that the complaint be dismissed without prejudice. Motion carried with Grady, Johnson, Poskochil, Shepard, Strand, and Moline voting aye, and with Gale not participating or voting, being absent and excused.

Item E Complaint # 2005-018

Deputy Director Mayrose presented the alleged violations and investigative report to the Commission and, when necessary, answered questions on this matter.

After being advised of the results of the investigation and discussion, a motion was made by Strand that the complaint be set for hearing. After further discussion, the motion was withdrawn. A motion was made by Johnson and seconded by Strand that the complaint be held in abeyance, and that the Commission file a complaint on its own motion regarding dual agency and unworthiness. Motion carried with Grady, Johnson, Poskochil, Shepard, Strand, and Moline voting aye, and with Gale not participating or voting, being absent and excused.

Item F Complaint # 2005-019

Deputy Director Mayrose presented the alleged violations and investigative report to the Commission and, when necessary, answered questions on this matter.

After being advised of the results of the investigation and discussion, a motion was made by Shepard and seconded by Grady that the complaint be set for hearing. Motion carried with Grady, Johnson, Poskochil, Shepard, Strand, and Moline voting aye, and with Gale not participating or voting, being absent and excused.

Item G Complaint # 2004-053, Commission vs. Steven M. Abboud

Deputy Director Mayrose noted that Mr. Abboud had not renewed his license. Since the Commission no longer had jurisdiction over him, the complaint should be dismissed. If Mr. Abboud ever reapplied for a license, he would have to address the complaint at that time.

A motion was made by Grady and seconded by Strand that the complaint be dismissed without prejudice. Motion carried with Grady, Johnson, Poskochil, Shepard, Strand, and Moline voting aye, and with Gale not participating or voting, being absent and excused.

Presentation of Stipulation and Consent Orders

Complaint 2005-008,
Jeffrey E. and Connie A. Williamson vs. Troy Lynn Musick

Deputy Director Mayrose presented a stipulation and consent order in the matter of Complaint 2005-008, Jeffrey E. and Connie A. Williamson vs. Troy Lynn Musick. A copy of said order is attached to and made a part of these minutes. Mr. Musick was not present.

Deputy Director Mayrose reviewed the circumstances involved and noted the provisions of the order, which had been signed by Mr. Musick. The order specified a censure plus three hours of additional continuing education in agency, to be completed within 90 days.

After discussion, a motion was made by Shepard and seconded by Poskochil to enter into the order as corrected. Motion carried with Grady, Johnson, Poskochil, Shepard, Strand, and Moline voting aye, and with Gale not participating or voting, being absent and excused.

Hearings

There were no hearings scheduled for the meeting.

Informal Special Appearances

Joseph John Vampola, Salesperson Applicant

Director Tyrrell presented exhibits which included correspondence regarding Mr. Vampola=s special appearance, Mr. Vampola=s salesperson application, information regarding Mr. Vampola=s criminal history, and letters of reference. A copy of said exhibit is attached to and made a part of these minutes. Mr. Vampola was present.

Acting Chairperson Moline reviewed the procedure for informal special appearances.

Mr. Vampola said that, a lot of years ago, he was in a drug situation of using and getting drugs for someone else. The other person got caught, and set him up. Mr. Vampola wound up pleading guilty to possession, and was sentenced to 1 year. He served the six months required, and had been clean and sober for a lot of years now. Mr. Vampola said he put in for a pardon a week ago, and was approved for a hearing on September 21. His sentencing judge said he saw no problem with it, and said to put his name down. The conviction will never be gone, because it will always be in his memory, but Mr. Vampola wanted to move on.

Acting Chairperson Moline asked when the conviction happened. Mr. Vampola said it happened in 1992, and was over in November 1993. Acting Chairperson Moline asked what Mr. Vampola had been doing since. Mr. Vampola said he worked in a can factory, and lost some fingers in an accident. Workers compensation paid for his college, and he got a business degree. About a year ago, Mr. Vampola finished a year of appraisal work, but he really wanted to go into real estate.

Acting Chairperson Moline noted that Mr. Vampola had graduated college with honors. Mr. Vampola said he had taken school real seriously, and had worked real hard at it, which was how he did everything. He was proud of his accomplishments, and his instructors had been supportive. It seemed like everything that had happened to him was for a reason.

Commissioner Johnson asked if Mr. Vampola had talked to any employing brokers. Mr. Vampola said yes, one would be happy to have him after Mr. Vampola passed the examination. Commissioner Johnson asked if Mr. Vampola had any problem with the appraiser test. Mr. Vampola said he did not take the test, because he was at the apprentice level. He had done over 400 appraisals, but was short one year of experience to get certified. He had called every appraisal company in Lincoln and Omaha, to get in the rest of the time required to be licensed, but nobody needed help.

Commissioner Poskochil said he appreciated the letters of support for Mr. Vampola, and noted there was one from his ex-wife.

After discussion, a motion was made by Strand and seconded by Poskochil to allow Mr. Vampola to sit for the salesperson examination after making proper application, and to have a license issued upon passing.

Commissioner Grady asked if the motion should specify that could happen after Mr. Vampola received a pardon. Commissioner Strand said that was not a part of his motion. He did not want to make a license contingent on receiving a pardon.

Motion carried with Grady, Johnson, Poskochil, Shepard, Strand, and Moline voting aye, and with Gale not participating or voting, being absent and excused.

Andrea Cary, Potential Applicant

Director Tyrrell presented an exhibit which included correspondence regarding Ms. Cary=s special appearance, information regarding Ms. Cary=s criminal history, and a letter of reference. A copy of said exhibit is attached to and made a part of these minutes. Ms. Cary was present.

Acting Chairperson Moline reviewed the procedure for informal special appearances.

Ms. Cary said she had a felony charge in 2003 for possession of a controlled substance. She had completed probation, a treatment program, and parenting classes. Acting Chairperson Moline asked if she had been using drugs herself. Ms. Cary said the drug she got caught with was not the one she used, and she had not realized the seriousness of what two pills would do. Acting Chairperson Moline asked what Ms. Cary had used herself. Ms. Cary said she used marijuana. Acting Chairperson Moline asked if she had stopped. Ms. Cary said yes, probably since last March. She had just graduated from probation on July 30. Her probation officer had told her to not come in for her last appointment, because she had completed everything.

Commissioner Johnson asked for Ms. Cary=s work history for the last couple of years. Ms. Cary said she had done lots of different things. After she received her GED, she became a certified nurses=s aide; then studied criminal justice at Metro, but did not like it, and quit; and she was now going to Randall School of Real Estate. She had not worked that much, when she was pregnant. She was currently working in marketing research, which was OK for right now. Commissioner Johnson asked if she had talked to brokers about employment. Ms. Cary said she had been offered a job, and that several brokers wanted her to work for them.

Commissioner Grady asked if Ms. Cary was a single parent. Ms. Cary said yes.

Commissioner Shepard asked for clarification on when Ms. Cary stopped using marijuana. Ms. Cary said it was a year ago last March.

Acting Chairperson Moline asked if Ms. Cary had ever had trouble with alcohol. Ms. Cary said no. Acting Chairperson Moline asked if Ms. Cary had a current driver=s license. Ms. Cary said yes. Commissioner Strand asked if Ms. Cary had any driving offenses. Ms. Cary said just for speeding. Commissioner Strand asked if there were any DUIs. Ms. Cary said no.

Commissioner Poskochil asked if Ms. Cary had any other charges or arrests regarding drugs. Ms. Cary said no.

Commissioner Strand noted that it was rare to see a felony conviction with a sentence of probation only. It had been only a short time since she was off probation, and the Commission liked to see plenty of time of being clean. Commissioner Strand said it seemed the courts must have thought it was only a moderate offense. Ms. Cary said she had never ever been in trouble otherwise, and that may be why.

Acting Chairperson Moline noted the Commission=s guidelines for applicants with felony convictions, and asked Ms. Cary if she had paid all restitution or fines. Ms. Cary said yes, she had paid her probation fines, which was required before release from probation. Acting Chairperson Moline noted that licensees had a lot of responsibilities, with having people in the car, and with the size of the transaction in their lives. Acting Chairperson Moline asked why Ms. Cary felt she was ready for a real estate license at this point. Ms. Cary said she was ready for a new start, and for something good in her life. She had tried several different options, and this seemed like a good spot for her.

Commissioner Shepard said he thought Ms. Cary was on the right track, but his biggest concern was the brief time from the end of probation to today. It was just a time factor, because he wanted there to be enough time to make sure she had no future problems. Commissioner Shepard said he thought the rest of the Commissioners were also having trouble with it.

Commissioner Poskochil asked if Ms. Cary was currently employed. Ms. Cary said she did market research surveys over the phone, to assess whether people wanted to spend money on a product before it was produced. Commissioner Poskochil asked how she liked it. Ms. Cary said it was a job. Commissioner Grady asked if she worked full time. Ms. Cary said she worked 20 hours per week, and took care of her daughter.

Commissioner Johnson asked if she had been counseled about being a single parent with a small child, and that it could be difficult to get started in the real estate business. Ms. Cary said her mom helped her out a lot.

Commissioner Grady said he was concerned about the timing. He did not know what the magic date was, but he felt the Commission should not approve Ms. Cary to sit until more time had passed without problems. Acting Chairperson Moline said more time would show her track record, and whether Ms. Cary had changed her life and things were going in right direction. Commissioner Poskochil said he agreed, and having more letters of support would help him approve her to sit. All Ms. Cary had provided was one letter.

Commissioner Strand said he was dwelling on the court sentence of only probation, which was completed with rave reviews. He agreed that the Commission wanted licensees of integrity and ability. If the possession charge was for two pills, and she had completed probation and cleaned up her act, Commissioner Strand would err on the side of giving people a chance.

A motion was made by Strand and seconded by Johnson, for discussion purposes, to allow Ms. Cary to sit for the salesperson examination after making proper application, and to have a license issued upon passing.

Commissioner Shepard said he would vote against the motion. Ms. Cary=s probation had ended less than 30 days ago. He wanted to see more time pass, and letters of recommendation, maybe a year from now. If everything was going well then, he would vote yes, but today he would vote no.

Commissioner Johnson noted that Ms. Cary had done some work that was not all that exciting to her. He noted that she could do other things for a real estate firm, and learn a lot about the industry, without a license. That would allow her to get more comfortable with real estate. Commissioner Johnson would like to have more time pass since Ms. Cary was off probation, which was basically the way the Commissioners treated everybody. If she got some real estate experience and came back in a year with a good record, he would probably be willing to vote yes at that time.

Commissioner Grady said that a larger support group who could attest to fact that she was on the straight and narrow would also help to sell her case.

A vote was taken on the pending motion. Motion failed with Strand voting aye, with Grady, Johnson, Poskochil, Shepard, and Moline voting nay, and with Gale not participating or voting, being absent and excused.

Acting Chairperson Moline noted that, when Ms. Cary came back before the Commission, she should bring letters of support and be able to show what she had accomplished. She may have the opportunity to sit for the examination then, and should talk to staff in six months. Acting Chairperson Moline said it was a great suggestion for her to get experience in real estate.

Ms. Cary asked if she should finish her classes, so that she did not waste the money she had spent, and then wait for six months. Acting Chairperson Moline said that was her call, but if the classes were completed, she would be ready to go. She could decide then whether she wanted to review for the examination on her own or in a class. Acting Chairperson Moline said she should ask staff for help and guidance.

Preliminary Consideration of Acquiring Statutory Authority to Fine

Director Tyrrell presented an exhibit regarding the statutory authority to fine in other jurisdictions. A copy of said exhibit is attached to and made a part of these minutes.

Director Tyrrell said this was on the agenda as the result of Commission discussions. Director Tyrrell reviewed the exhibit, and noted that any fines levied would go to the Nebraska school fund. Past arguments against it included: 1) if fines were set in stone, there was a disparate impact of a $1000 fine to a small or large firm; and 2) the Commission would need to develop an equitable system. That was probably why it had not been done in the past. There were agencies that levied fines in Nebraska and in other jurisdictions. The Commission had good cooperation with county attorneys in prosecuting unlicensed persons, which was usually a misdemeanor with a $100 fine, and the Commission usually did not hear from them again. Nebraska did not have the problem some jurisdictions had with unlicensed persons. Director Tyrrell could give arguments on both sides, and would do whatever the Commission decided.

Acting Chairperson Moline asked Perre Neilan, representing the Nebraska REALTORS7 Association, to comment. Mr. Neilan said the licensing task force had discussed fining and had done research on it. The Association did not decide whether to support or oppose it, because it was not part of their recommendation at this time. Mr. Neilan asked if statutory changes would be required. Director Tyrrell said yes. The Commission would have to decide whether to rush something into the next legislative session, or take time to research it thoroughly and do it the following year.

Commissioner Grady asked if the $25 per month late renewal fee went to the school fund. Director Tyrrell said he did not know why, but it stayed with the Commission.

Commissioner Johnson said he was neutral on the issue, and could vote either way. Previous Commissioners had spoken to him in opposition of fining. The issue had not come up in a while. Acting Chairperson Moline asked what reasons had been given to oppose fining. Commissioner Johnson said it did not really have that much effect on the performance of licensees fined. Director Tyrrell said that a complaint would have to go to hearing in order to levy a fine, unless there was a stipulation and consent order. Some jurisdictions had authority for summary judgment.

Commissioner Strand said that, if it streamlined the process for nit-picky stuff with a schedule of fines, it could work. He would not want to set every complaint for hearing in order to collect a fine. Commissioner Strand wanted a model from other jurisdictions for a streamlined process. Acting Chairperson Moline asked if it should be like a traffic violation, where a person could pay the fine or go to court. Commissioner Strand said that was right. Director Tyrrell said he did not know if the Legislature would want to give up a finding of probable cause. Commissioner Strand said that, if the Commission wanted, staff could research the 41 jurisdictions with fining authority for the best model, rather than invent it ourselves.

Commissioner Poskochil said he would not want to get to the point of small fines taking away from the seriousness of the violation. Licensees might think violations were no big deal if they just had to pay a $50 fine. Acting Chairperson Moline said it should go along with a censure and additional continuing education. Director Tyrrell said that, if there was a censure, then probable cause was required.

Commissioner Poskochil said the Commission did not know if the other jurisdictions were happy with having fining authority. Director Tyrrell said he could ask, but there were not many directors who would say it was not good if their Commissioners had decided to fine. There was probably more disagreement among Commissioners than between the Commission and the director.

Commissioner Shepard noted that, if the Commission was thinking fines would be a deterrent, $25 or $50 was not much of a deterrent. If the Commission wanted an automatic fine for examiners finding forms violations, it would open a whole can of worms. If there were not current massive problems, Commissioner Shepard would want the Commission to think and talk about it for a great while before doing it. Director Tyrrell said that raised a good point, and that the Commission would probably need more proof than for staff to say that a form was not in a file.

Commissioner Poskochil agreed that fining would be an issue of larger amounts, over $100, because less than that meant almost nothing today. Probation and the risk of revocation meant more than a fine. Commissioner Poskochil did not want people to get sloppy and just take the fine. Defending one=s self at a hearing already cost a lot of money.

Commissioner Shepard said the Commission could have the option to fine, but did not have to use it.

Commissioner Poskochil asked when a fine would be better than a censure. Acting Chairperson Moline said that, during his tenure on the Commission, there had been a few times when 3 or 6 hours of continuing education seemed like an inappropriate response to a situation. Fines could be a good tool for someone who had been disciplined several times for the same thing, and the Commission was not getting the person=s attention otherwise. Acting Chairperson Moline said he favored equal fines, only after a finding of guilt. The Commission could not fine big companies more than little ones, because it would fine individuals, not companies. Fining could be out there as tool that was available to the Commission for appropriate situations. There had been maybe 5 times that a penalty did not truly answer what had happened. One time, the Commission took the license, and might not have had to if a fine was available. An upper limit of $2500 might be appropriate, but not $10,000. The Commission should have staff look at other jurisdictions, and find out specifics on how fines were handled. If 44 other jurisdictions were doing it, maybe it was a good idea.

Commissioner Grady noted that, in his area=s Board of REALTORS7, there was a penalty fine for not turning in documents in a timely manner. That worked for some agents, but other agents did not care, and just paid $25 to submit documents when they wanted to. Fines worked for some, but not all. Commissioner Johnson said that even a $250 fine would not bother some people. If it was $5000 or $10,000, that might get their attention. Acting Chairperson Moline said a fine would be on top of a censure and continuing education, and would ice the cake to get their attention.

Commissioner Grady said it might force licensees to do things right, and to realize they could not change dates, must get changes initialed, etc. Commissioner Grady liked the idea of finding out more about the experiences in other jurisdictions.

It was the consensus of the Commission to ask staff to find out more details on how other jurisdictions handled fines against both licensed and unlicensed people.

Consider Reduction of Renewal Fee for 2006 and License Issuance Fees Effective January 1, 2006

Director Tyrrell presented an exhibit regarding the potential fee reduction impact. A copy of said exhibit is attached to and made a part of these minutes.

Director Tyrrell noted that the state required the Commission to encumber money to pay bills for the previous fiscal year. The Commission had approximately $26,000 in encumbrances, for bills incurred prior to July 1. Director Tyrrell reviewed the exhibit, and noted that any new license fee change would go into effect January 1, 2006.

Acting Chairperson Moline noted that the Budget and Finance Subcommittee had met prior to the meeting. The Commission had wanted to stop building the cushion of money, and this fee reduction would bring the Commission close to that. The Budget and Finance Subcommittee recommended a $10 reduction in renewal fees for 2006, and new license fees effective January 1, 2006.

Commissioner Strand asked how many new licensees were expected next year. Director Tyrrell noted that 124 new brokers and 727 new salespeople were expected, from the budget projections last year. This year, the Commission had 134 new brokers and 725 new salespeople. The Commission=s excess money was coming primarily from application and examination fees, and other fees were holding steady.

Commissioner Poskochil asked if the Commission should consider only lowering renewal fees for current licensees. Director Tyrrell said it was more equitable, and easier to justify to the Legislature, to charge one fee for a license to do business.

After discussion, a motion was made by Shepard and seconded by Johnson to approve a $10 reduction in renewal fees for 2006 and new license fees effective January 1, 2006. Motion carried with Grady, Johnson, Poskochil, Shepard, Strand, and Moline voting aye, and with Gale not participating or voting, being absent and excused.

Consider Hiring of Pre-Hearing Conference Officers

Director Tyrrell presented an exhibit regarding the hiring of hearing officers. A copy of said exhibit is attached to and made a part of these minutes.

Counsel Stenberg noted that Chairperson Gale had concerns regarding the way hearings were conducted. He wanted them handled as efficiently as possible, out of concern for Commission=s time. Pre-hearing conferences would allow attorneys to clearly identify the issues before the Commission; identify and mark all exhibits, so there were no surprises; identify witnesses and significant legal issues; get briefs submitted on those points; and get rulings on discovery disputes, interrogatories, and depositions. Everybody would be up to speed, especially Chairperson Gale. The rules permitted appointing a hearing officer to handle these issues. Chairperson Gale would make the appointment, then it was up to the hearing officer to give notice and conduct the pre-hearing conference. Chairperson Gale had formulated some processes and procedures with Counsel Stenberg=s help, and had a number of forms prepared. In cases with more complex legal issues and facts, this would be a benefit to everybody involved.

Acting Chairperson Moline asked if Chairperson Gale wanted to do this on every case. Counsel Stenberg said no, because the process would not be necessary on relatively simple cases. Both parties would have the option of requesting a pre-hearing conference after the notice of hearing. It might be useful when there were complex legal questions, significant discovery, or complicated cases. Both sides would be invited to say whether they felt a pre-hearing conference was necessary or useful, and could oppose having a pre-hearing conference.

Acting Chairperson Moline said he had some concerns that, if Commission hearings became such a court of law, true justice would not be served. A lot of times, licensees represented themselves, and this would preclude that. A lot of times, exhibits were already marked. There were only two or three times that this would have been useful in Acting Chairperson Moline=s six years on the Commission. Acting Chairperson Moline questioned whether Commissioners would be allowed to use a smoking gun to exonerate or convict a licensee, if one showed up, and whether the Commission would be hamstrung by this process if the next Secretary of State was not an attorney. Counsel Stenberg said it would not make it too complicated. If there were only simple issues involved, the Commission would probably not hold a pre-hearing conference, and the hearing would be done the same way as now. If there was a pre-hearing conference, there would be more complex issues involved, and a licensee would probably have legal counsel. If not, they would not have to struggle that much to comply. Counsel Stenberg would identify the legal issues, so a licensee would not have to do that. The parties would have to identify witnesses and bring exhibits, which was typically required anyway. This was intended to make it more accessible, not more legalistic. Counsel Stenberg said the Commission would not be hamstrung by it, because it was an option, not a requirement.

Commissioner Grady asked for the current status. Counsel Stenberg said he would never be a hearing officer. Acting Chairperson Moline noted that Counsel Stenberg would be fulfilling Counsel Widger=s duties, and would always represent the Commission. A pre-hearing officer would be a third party appointed from the exhibit list to deal with issues prior to bringing hearings to the Commission.

Director Tyrrell noted that the Commission had held two or three pre-hearing conferences since Title 305 went into effect. Greg Lemon had served as the pre-hearing officer, as part of his Secretary of State=s office duties. The exhibit list included names Chairperson Gale selected from people that State Personnel and other agencies had used as pre-hearing officers.

Commissioner Johnson asked how pre-hearing conferences would be handled. Counsel Stenberg said most would be conducted by conference call, since people were spread out all over the state. The parties would submit exhibits and witness lists in advance of the pre-hearing conference, so the parties and the pre-hearing officer would have them. The pre-hearing officer would prepare the final order regarding legal issues, exhibits, and witnesses. A pre-hearing conference provided for cooperative interaction between the parties. Counsel Stenberg would probably do the bulk of the work, and would make sure any needed work got done. If there were unresolved issues, they would be considered at the pre-hearing conference. It may take some experimentation to see how it works.

Counsel Stenberg said it was possible for a smoking gun exhibit or surprise witness to come up, since the Commission operated under the Administrative Procedure Act and was not bound by strict rules of evidence, unless requested by counsel. The Chairperson would probably permit it to come into evidence, unless it was seriously prejudicial or there was no excuse for late submittal. If it was something that only came up later, it would probably be allowed. If it was significant, the Commission might have to continue the hearing to allow the other party to address it. That was the same process currently used.

Commissioner Strand said he had been in opposition to pre-hearing conferences from the start, and did not see a need for them on this Commission. It may seem like a contradiction that the Commission took hearings seriously, but that the informality helped him as a layman to know what was going on. Some things happened spontaneously that helped the Commissioners understand the question at hand. Commissioner Strand did not know whether the Commission should address this issue when Chairperson Gale was gone.

Acting Chairperson Moline noted that it was an agenda item. People had been bending his ear, and two-thirds of them were not happy with it. Acting Chairperson Moline asked if strict rules of evidence would apply. Counsel Stenberg said it could be applied, and could be invoked by either side three days in advance of the hearing. Counsel Stenberg said he agreed with Commissioner Strand, that being informal helped. A pre-hearing conference would not make it more formal. Director Tyrrell noted that less than approximately 5% of all hearings were held with strict rules of evidence, in all his time with the Commission. It was generally only done with complex cases, when revocation was on the line.

Commissioner Shepard asked if it boiled down to being a time saver for the Commission. Commissioner Poskochil asked if it was more for the Chairperson. Counsel Stenberg said that was part of it, so things would be well-organized, and make hearings go more smoothly and more quickly.

Commissioner Johnson noted that his observation of Chairperson Gale was that he did not like to have exhibits come before him when he had not seen them before. That was just his observation, which may be wrong. Counsel Stenberg said that was part of it, because Chairperson Gale wanted to be informed and do a good job of running the hearing. He could do a better job with fewer surprises, and would like to have legal questions identified. It was not like a court of law, but sometimes there were issues of statute interpretation as to whether there was a violation or not.

Acting Chairperson Moline asked if it would be the pre-hearing officer=s call on whether there were violations of rules. Counsel Stenberg said that was a call for the Commission to make. Counsel Stenberg did not believe the Chairperson had any special authority in that regard. Once a brief was submitted, that let him know the issues in advance, and it was his intent to share briefs with the other Commissioners. Counsel Stenberg wanted the Commission to have as much information in advance as they wanted, including exhibits and briefs. If there were significant legal issues, he preferred that the Commissioners have them in advance, because they have to make the calls.

Commissioner Grady asked for staff=s position on pre-hearing conferences. Director Tyrrell noted that Title 305 was put out by the Attorney General=s office in the early 1990s as model rules. The Commission had a problem with Chapter 4, regarding contested cases, which specified that agency directors make the decision. That worked for code agencies, but not for the Commission. It took months to change the wording to work for the Commission. Pre-hearing conferences had been used a few times, maybe two or three, and was a good process to use for issues that could not be worked out between the parties. The Commission had never hired pre-hearing officers before, because the Secretary of State=s office had loaned its deputy, Greg Lemon. The Commission would have to hold a pre-hearing conference if it was requested, it was just a question of hiring a pre-hearing officer.

Commissioner Strand asked if the large increase in budgeted legal fees was in contemplation of this procedure. Director Tyrrell said no, that was because the attorneys= fees had increased. This item was on the agenda so that the Commission could give Director Tyrrell the authority to enter into contracts with pre-hearing officers. Director Tyrrell had asked Chairperson Gale whether the Commission should wait until he was in attendance to address the issue, and he said to go ahead.

Acting Chairperson Moline reviewed the Commission=s options. Commissioner Grady said it could be postponed. Commissioner Strand said the Commission could vote, on the record, so that it did not have to come back to the Commission again.

Counsel Stenberg noted that it was up to the Commission as a whole whether to hire pre-hearing officers, but it was up to the Chairperson to appoint them. The Chairperson could still appoint pre-hearing officers, but they would not get paid unless the Commission approved it. Director Tyrrell noted that another option was to use the chief deputy from the Chairperson=s office.

Acting Chairperson Moline said his concern was approving six pre-hearing officers, if this was only needed from time to time. Director Tyrrell said the Commission was approving these people to be contacted by Chairperson Gale as needed. Acting Chairperson Moline clarified that it was not six to handle the workload. Director Tyrrell said no, these were just the people with whom he initially chose to enter into a contract, so the Commission would be good to go when needed. Commissioner Strand asked why they would not be contracted on a case-by-case basis. Director Tyrrell said the Commission could do it that way, but they would have to wait for the next Commission meeting to approve a pre-hearing officer, which would move the hearing to at least the Commission meeting after that.

Commissioner Poskochil asked how many pre-hearing conferences Chairperson Gale was envisioning in a year. Counsel Stenberg said he could not speak for him. Commissioner Poskochil questioned why the Commission would get into this, if the Commission had not held two pre-hearing conferences in the past eight years, unless Chairperson Gale wanted to use the option a lot more. Counsel Stenberg reiterated that he could not speak for him on that. The way it was currently set up, somebody had to ask for one. If one was asked for, it would probably happen. Acting Chairperson Moline asked if the Chairperson could order it. Counsel Stenberg said the chairperson did have the authority to order it, even if one was not asked for.

A motion was made by Grady and seconded by Johnson to give Director Tyrrell the authority to enter into memorandums of agreement and understanding, per the exhibit and at the rates negotiated.

Commissioner Poskochil asked where the amounts came from. Director Tyrrell said that State Personnel indicated these were the going rates for grievances. Director Tyrrell estimated two to five hours total for each pre-hearing conference.

Commissioner Grady said it was very clear where Chairperson Gale is at, and there was no point to delay the vote. Motion carried with Grady, Johnson, Poskochil, and Shepard voting aye, with Strand voting nay, with Moline abstaining, and with Gale not participating or voting, being absent and excused.

Approve Records Retention Schedule

Director Tyrrell presented an exhibit which consisted of the proposed records retention schedule. A copy of said exhibit is attached to and made a part of these minutes.

A motion was made by Shepard and seconded by Strand to approve schedule as submitted. Motion carried with Grady, Johnson, Poskochil, Shepard, Strand, and Moline voting aye, and with Gale not participating or voting, being absent and excused.

Preliminary Discussion - Continued Use of Pocket Cards

Acting Chairperson Moline noted that current statute required the collection and return of the pocket card for transfers. Licensees were no longer required to carry the pocket card, and tended to lose it. It essentially served as a receipt that the licensee had paid the license fee. Its use was limited, if it was used at all. Director Tyrrell said that some continuing education providers used it to get the license number, so that was one ancillary use. The auditors required that it be turned back in, as a control device. Acting Chairperson Moline said that, in practice, nobody asked licensees to prove they held a license via the pocket card. He did not want to eliminate it, just to eliminate the requirement to return it to the office. Acting Chairperson Moline asked the Commissioners to consider asking staff to develop legislation to call the pocket card a receipt, so that it did not have to be collected for all licensees who transferred, which was a colossal waste of time for the broker, the Commission, and everybody involved.

Commissioner Grady asked how important the pocket card was for continuing education providers. Deputy Director Hoffman said the license number would still be put on the receipt, just not on a pocket card. Director Tyrrell noted that the pocket card would still be generated, with the license number, and just used as a receipt. The law would have to change so that it would not have to be collected. Director Tyrrell would check with the auditors to make sure it would not be required to come in if it was just a receipt.

Commissioner Grady asked if it was the same license number every year. Director Tyrrell said yes, it was the same number since the day it was issued. Acting Chairperson Moline said that schools asked for the license number. Deputy Director Hoffman said that how it was received or retained was up to the Commission. Acting Chairperson Moline said he wanted to get rid of having to gather the cards, since they were not used. If one is lost, the licensee had to do a lost pocket card affidavit, and staff had to reissue a new one.

It was the consensus of the Commission to have staff look into it with the auditor, and bring proposed legislative changes to the Commission for final approval.

Renew Errors and Omissions Insurance Contract for 2006

Director Tyrrell presented an exhibit which consisted of the proposed errors and omissions insurance contract renewal rates. A copy of said exhibit is attached to and made a part of these minutes.

A motion was made by Strand and seconded by Shepard to approve renewing the contract with Williams Underwriting Group, Inc. for 2006. Motion carried with Grady, Johnson, Poskochil, Shepard, Strand, and Moline voting aye, and with Gale not participating or voting, being absent and excused.

2004-2005 Objectives - Final Report

Director Tyrrell presented an exhibit regarding the 2004-2005 objectives. A copy of said exhibit is attached to and made a part of these minutes.

No action was necessary on this report.

Presentation of Statutory and Rule Amendments Proposed by the Nebraska REALTORS7 Association

Director Tyrrell presented an exhibit regarding the statutory and rule amendments proposed by the Nebraska REALTORS7 Association. A copy of said exhibit is attached to and made a part of these minutes.

Director Tyrrell noted that he had added three pages to the Nebraska REALTORS7 Association letter, to provide Commissioners with the current Congressional districts, the old Congressional districts, and the ARELLO Digest jurisdictions report regarding test score retention.

Henry Kammandel Sr., representing the Nebraska REALTORS7 Association, thanked Acting Chairperson Moline for his excellent service on the Commission for the past six years. Mr. Kammandel said the recommendations were approved by the Association=s Board of Directors. Mr. Kammandel reviewed the Nebraska REALTORS7 Association=s letter.

Regarding recommendation #1, Acting Chairperson Moline noted that Congressional districts were subject to change, and perhaps the Commission should think ahead and have the Governor appoint representatives at large. Acting Chairperson Moline thought the Governor would be good about picking representatives from across the state, and it was food for thought.

Regarding recommendation #2, Acting Chairperson Moline noted that the statute as written did not allow taking the examination prior to receiving the criminal history report. Mr. Kammandel said the Nebraska REALTORS7 Association would be happy to assist in changing the statute. Commissioner Grady asked how long it was taking for criminal history reports. Director Tyrrell said it was down to 7 days this month. It depended on whether the Commission wanted the delay before the examination, or before issuance of the license. Commissioner Strand said it was still a variable beyond the Commission=s control. Acting Chairperson Moline said applicants wanted to take the test right after their classes ended. Commissioner Poskochil noted that fees would not be refunded if something came up on the background check after the examination. Director Tyrrell noted that licensees could currently have the examination fee refunded if they were not allowed to take the examination due to their criminal history, and that would not be possible if they took the examination first. Commissioner Poskochil asked if other jurisdictions had problems with this. Deputy Director Hoffman said that Kentucky was currently changing their law to require the criminal history report up front, because it was problematic to do a criminal check after the fact.

Regarding recommendation #3, Mr. Kammandel said that, as he looked at it today, perhaps applicants from other states should meet the suggested requirement before getting a reciprocal license. However, the Board of Directors had passed it as written.

Regarding recommendation #6, Director Tyrrell noted that the Commission currently required community college course instructors and pre-license classes to be approved. Deputy Director Hoffman noted it was required of the University too, and none of them failed to pass muster with the Commission Guidelines. Acting Chairperson Moline said that this one was already taken care of, then. Director Tyrrell noted that the Commission required that law classes be taught by attorneys, and preference is given for appraisal classes to be taught by appraisers, finance classes to be taught by instructors with a background in finance, and principles and practices to be taught by instructors with a real estate background. The Commission thought it was important for pre-license instructors to have a background in the subject matter they teach.

Mr. Kammandel said the Association wanted law classes to focus on Nebraska law, not case studies. Commissioner Poskochil asked if the Commission had approval on what was taught. Deputy Director Hoffman said the Commission developed the course outlines, and she had not ever heard a complaint about an unqualified attorney. Instructor evaluations were monitored by the Commission and the Department of Education. Occasionally there was a shortage of attorneys in smaller towns, and the Commission had approved temporary instructors.

Commissioner Johnson asked if any other states allowed non-attorneys to teach real estate law. Deputy Director Hoffman said she did not know.

Commissioner Johnson said he wanted more discussion on recommendation #5 regarding retakes. Deputy Director Hoffman said the topic had been visited before. The philosophy of the Commission had been that licensees should be able to demonstrate competency at any given time. Larry Fabrey of AMP thought the Commission=s position was defendable in that way. Competency in all areas of real estate practice was required for performance of the job, and licensees must demonstrate it. Many jurisdictions required passage of both portions at once.

Commissioner Strand asked a rhetorical question of how many licensees would pass the examination 2-3 years into practice. Director Tyrrell said he had mentioned to audiences that the Commission could potentially accept passing the examination instead of continuing education, but there was no support for it. Commissioner Strand said that would be true of almost any licensing examination. Acting Chairperson Moline said it was a question of whether the items on the examination were needed to do the job. Director Tyrrell said they should be, since they were based on a job questionnaire and analysis.

Regarding recommendation #1, Commissioner Poskochil asked how districting was currently done. Director Tyrrell explained the maps in the exhibit. Acting Chairperson Moline said the

Governor would pick good people. Commissioner Strand said the sentiment was to codify it, to ensure representation from agricultural areas.

Acting Chairperson Moline asked what kind of changes would be needed for each recommendation. Director Tyrrell said that #1, #2, and #3 would require statutory changes; #4 would be an agenda item for a new pre-license course, unless it was an application requirement; #5 might require a rule change; and #6 was a guideline that could be changed as an agenda item.

Acting Chairperson Moline noted an email he had received from Chairperson Gale, suggesting that the Commission create a legislation subcommittee to research the recommendations and report back to the Commission. Chairperson Gale hoped that staff would consult with the proposers and legal counsel, and would invite the Nebraska REALTORS7 Association representatives back to the next Commission meeting.

Commissioner Johnson said that seemed reasonable. Commissioner Strand said it seemed like duplicate licensee input, since the majority of Commissioners were licensees, and the Commission did not need a committee subset. Acting Chairperson Moline said that Chairperson Gale preferred subcommittees, but the Commission used to do things directly all the time. The Commission could do it however they wanted, and could tell staff to meet with the Nebraska REALTORS7 Association representatives to work out a recommendation. Commissioner Shepard asked if that was the consensus of the Commission, and said he agreed with the subcommittee way. Acting Chairperson Moline appointed Shepard, Johnson, and Poskochil to the subcommittee, and requested a report at the next meeting.

Special Resolution

At 12:48 p.m., Acting Chairperson Moline passed the gavel to Acting Chairperson Johnson.

Director Tyrrell presented a special resolution regarding Commissioner Moline=s service to the Commission. A copy of said exhibit is attached to and made a part of these minutes.

A motion was made by Grady and seconded by Shepard to approve the resolution. Motion carried with Grady, Poskochil, Shepard, Strand, and Johnson voting aye, with Moline not participating or voting, and with Gale not participating or voting, being absent and excused.

At 12:52 p.m., Acting Chairperson Johnson passed the gavel back to Acting Chairperson Moline.

A motion was made by Johnson and seconded by Strand that the Commission go on record as thanking Ms. Burklund, with a great amount of gratitude, for her years of service to the Commission.

Commissioner Johnson said the Commission appreciated her ability to accurately and concisely put together information on what the Commission did, her work coordinating Commission meetings and hearings, and everything else she did for the Commission. Commissioner Johnson said the Commissioners wished Ms. Burklund the best in her future endeavors. Acting Chairperson Moline said it had been a pleasure working with Ms. Burklund, and noted that she always had a smile on her face and was always helpful. He especially appreciated that, and said it had been a pleasure working with her. Acting Chairperson Moline wished Ms. Burklund all the best.

A vote was taken on the pending motion. Motion carried with Grady, Johnson, Poskochil, Shepard, Strand, and Moline voting aye, and with Gale not participating or voting, being absent and excused.

Information Matters

ARELLO Joint District Meeting - July 17-20, 2005 -
Nashville, Tennessee - Report of Attendees

Commissioner Johnson attended a panel discussion on minimum services, and the various issues covered were discussed.. There will be another panel on minimum services in Toronto. Commissioner Johnson reviewed law changes and issues from other states.

Commissioner Poskochil asked which minimum services were being discussed. Director Tyrrell said it was basically Nebraska=s agency law.

Director Tyrrell noted that it was rumored that Colorado may eliminate continuing education requirements, and may change the Commission structure.

No action was necessary on this report.

ARELLO Investigator Workshop - Report of Attendee

Deputy Director Mayrose said the Investigator Workshop had approximately 45 attendees. Topics included mortgage fraud, deception, internet investing, and report writing. It was a very good session.

No action was necessary on this report.

REEA Meeting - Myrtle Beach, South Carolina - Report of Attendee

Deputy Director Hoffman attended the REEA meeting in June. It was well-attended. The biggest opportunity at REEA meetings was for education directors to get together, because they were often not active in ARELLO. Topics included the struggles with post-license education implementation, and disciplining those licensees who did not get it done; minimum services; and applying PhD research to the classroom. The spotlight on speakers allowed education directors to see the presentation style and methods of national providers for 20 minutes each.

No action was necessary on this report.

Trust Account Examination Evaluation Report - Second Quarter 2005

Director Tyrrell presented the Trust Account Examination Evaluation Report - Second Quarter 2005. A copy of said report is attached to and made a part of these minutes.

Director Tyrrell reviewed some of the comments received, and how the situations were handled.

No action was necessary on this report.

Title 299, Chapter 2 Amendments - Multiple Trade Names -
signed by Governor on June 17, 2005;
filed with Secretary of State on June 17, 2005; effective June 22, 2005

Director Tyrrell noted that the amendments to Title 299, Chapter 2, completed the approval process and were effective June 22, 2005.

No action was necessary on this report.

ARELLO Annual Meeting - September 28-October 2, 2005 - Toronto, Ontario

Director Tyrrell presented an exhibit which included information on the upcoming ARELLO Annual Meeting. Commissioners Grady, Johnson, and Shepard indicated that they plan to attend.

No action was necessary on this report.

Future Meeting Dates

September 22-23, 2005 - Staybridge Suites, Lincoln
October 13-14, 2005 - Ramada Limited South, Lincoln
November 16-17, 2005 - Ramada Limited South, Lincoln
January 18-19, 2006 - Staybridge Suites, Lincoln

Recesses and Adjournment

At 10:10 a.m., Acting Chairperson Moline declared a brief recess, and reconvened the meeting at 10:19 a.m.

At 11:54 a.m., Acting Chairperson Moline declared a recess for lunch, and reconvened the meeting at 12:48 p.m.

At 12:48 p.m., Acting Chairperson Moline passed the gavel to Acting Chairperson Johnson.

At 12:52 p.m., Acting Chairperson Johnson passed the gavel back to Acting Chairperson Moline.

At 1:45 p.m., there being no further business to come before the Commission, Acting Chairperson Moline declared the meeting adjourned.

I, Les Tyrrell, Director of the Nebraska Real Estate Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing minutes of the August 24, 2005, meeting of the Nebraska Real Estate Commission were available for inspection on August 31, 2005, in compliance with Section 84-1413(5) R.R.S. 1943, of Nebraska.

Respectfully submitted,
Les Tyrrell
Director

Guests Signing the Guest List

Rod Faubion, NP Dodge/Great Plains School of Real Estate, Omaha
Craig Dullum, CBSHOME Real Estate, Omaha
Perre Neilan, Nebraska REALTORS
7 Association, Lincoln
Christie Jennings, Nebraska REALTORS
7 Association, Lincoln
Janet Palmtag, Nebraska REALTORS
7 Association/JJ Palmtag, Nebraska City
Henry Kammandel Sr., Nebraska REALTORS
7 Association/CBSHOME, Omaha
Tammy Brookhouser, Nebraska REALTORS
7 Association, Lincoln
Jerry Ahlvers, Nebraska REALTORS
7 Association, Omaha